15 statementsSworn testimony comes first. Within each group, the most specific claims lead.
QuestionTone: NeutralSpecificity: 0.8Under oath
“You have written about UAPs not only in the air but in underwater. Are there any specifics on what you have learned about the UAP activity in our oceans? Particularly, have you spoken with sources who have provided any evidence or eyewitness accounts of these UAPs interacting with our Naval forces or being detected by our underwater surveillance systems?”
“Are there any technological capabilities observed in these oceanic UAPs that seem to defy our current understanding of physics or our engineering capabilities?”
“And so, are there any accounts of UAPs emerging from or submerging into our water, which could indicate a base or presence beneath the ocean's surface?”
“I would like to know, with Immaculate Constellation, how does this relate to UAP activities, Mr. Shellenberger, in oceanic environments? Are there any instances where the Navy or other maritime forces have encountered UAPs that could not be explained by known technology or natural phenomena?”
“Are there any known instances of recovered materials or technologies that are not of human origin and may be connected to any advanced bioscience defense programs within the USG?”
“I think it is about five percent of our ocean that has actually been studied in detail by man, and we have studied more of space than we have of our own oceans.”
“And do you believe that there is a concerted effort by the Pentagon to keep Congress out of the loop regarding these UAP activities specifically in our waters?”
“So, there are rumors that have come up to the Hill of a secretive project within the Department of Defense involving the manipulation of human genetics with what is described as ''nonhuman genetic material'' potentially for the enhancement of human capabilities—hybrids. Are any of you familiar with that, yes or no?”