Take Me to Your Leader
Menu
Topic

Sensor Data

Discussion of radar, FLIR, satellite, and other sensor evidence that has captured anomalous objects performing maneuvers beyond known technology.

30 statements shown · 15 peopleUnder oath23 of them

Key claims

The 30 most specific statements on this topic (the list stops at 30)

Showing 30 of 30

Under oath

23 statementsSworn testimony comes first.
Andy BiggsRepresentativeEyewitness AccountUnder oath
“While performing a routine Airspace Surveillance and Control Mission in the Eastern Air Defense Sector, an F–22 fighter observed multiple UAP contacts at mission altitude. Moving to intercept, the F–22 pilot noted multiple metallic orbs, slightly smaller than a sedan, hovering in place. Upon vectoring toward the UAPs, a smaller formation of the metallic orbs accelerated at rapid speed toward the F–22, which was unable to establish radar locks on the presumed-hostile UAPs. The F–22 broke trajectory and attempted to evade but was intercepted and boxed in by approximately three to six UAPs.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - November 13, 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
Ryan GravesFormer Navy PilotEyewitness AccountUnder oath
“Some of the behaviors that we saw in our working area, we would see these objects being at 0.0 Mach—that is zero airspeed—over certain pieces of the ground. So, what that means just like a river if you throw a bobber in it is going to float downstream. These objects were staying completely stationary in category four hurricane winds. These same objects would then accelerate to supersonic speeds—1.1, 1.2 Mach—and they would do so in very erratic and quick behaviors that we do not—I do not have an explanation for.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
Tim GallaudetRear AdmiralFactual AssertionUnder oath
“Attached to the email is what is now known as the Go Fast video captured on the forward-looking infrared sensor of one of the Navy F/A–18 aircraft participating in the exercise. The now declassified video showed an unidentified object exhibiting flight and structural characteristics unlike anything in our arsenal.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - November 13, 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
Commander FravorNavy CommanderEyewitness AccountUnder oath
“No. You know, it has been said it is probably the most credible UFO sighting in history, based on all the sensors that were tracking it and then for us to get visual. And to go against the naysayers that it is something on the screen or whatever, I mean, there is four sets of human eyeballs. We are all very credible. Of the six of us that were involved in the thing, including the video, every one of us is going to do 20-plus years in the military in very responsible positions. I would say the world needs to know that. It is not a joke.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
Commander David FravorNavy CommanderEyewitness AccountUnder oath
“My crew that launched after we landed experienced significant jamming to the APG–73 radar, which was what we had on board, which is a mechanically scan very high-end system prior to the APG–79 and, yes, it did pretty much everything you could do—range, velocity, aspect—and then it split the lock, then the targeting pod is passive. That is what we were able to get the video on.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
Commander FravorNavy CommanderEyewitness AccountUnder oath
“So, we got within a half mile of the Tic Tac, which people say that is pretty far, but in airplanes that is actually relatively close. No, it was perfectly white, smooth, no windows, although when we did take the original FLIR video that is out there when you put it on a big screen it actually had two little objects that came out of the bottom of it. But other than that, no windows, no seams, no nothing.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
Ryan GravesFormer Navy PilotEyewitness AccountUnder oath
“I would think—well, in my opinion, I will say things are over-classified. I know for a fact the video or the pictures that came out in the—I think it was the 2020 report, that had the stuff off the East Coast that were taken with an iPhone off the East Coast. A buddy of mine was one of the senior people there and he said they originally classified it TS/SCI, and my question then was what is TS/SCI about these? They are an iPhone literally off the vacapes. That is not TS/SCI.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
Commander David FravorNavy CommanderEyewitness AccountUnder oath
“The Princeton tracked it. The Nimitz tracked it. The E2 tracked it. We never saw it on our radars. Our fire control radars never picked it up. The other airplane that took the video did get it on a radar. As soon as it tried to lock it, it jammed the radar, spit the lock and he rapidly switched over to the targeting pod, which you can do in the F–18.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
Ryan GravesFormer Navy PilotEyewitness AccountUnder oath
“Certainly. I think the most vivid sighting of that would have been a near mid-air that we had at the entrance to our working area. One of these objects was completely stationary at the exact entrance to our working areas, not only geographically but also altitude. So, it was right where all the jets are going, essentially, on the Eastern Seaboard. The two aircraft flew within about 50 feet of the object and that was a very close visual sighting.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →

Other public statements

7 statementsReports, documents, interviews and broadcasts where the speaker was not under oath.