Take Me to Your Leader
Menu
Topic

Classification Abuse

Allegations that classification systems have been improperly used to prevent congressional oversight and hide UAP-related programs from elected officials.

30 statements shown · 15 peopleUnder oath29 of them

Key claims

The 30 most specific statements on this topic (the list stops at 30)

Showing 30 of 30

Under oath

29 statementsSworn testimony comes first.
Ryan GravesFormer Navy PilotEyewitness AccountUnder oath
“I would think—well, in my opinion, I will say things are over-classified. I know for a fact the video or the pictures that came out in the—I think it was the 2020 report, that had the stuff off the East Coast that were taken with an iPhone off the East Coast. A buddy of mine was one of the senior people there and he said they originally classified it TS/SCI, and my question then was what is TS/SCI about these? They are an iPhone literally off the vacapes. That is not TS/SCI.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
Luis ElizondoFormer Government OfficialFactual AssertionUnder oath
“What we required was a memo from the Secretary of the Air Force in order to make that complete, and that never occurred. And so, when Secretary Mattis became Secretary of Defense, I decided it would be appropriate for me to try to receive a memo from him, as SecDef, as Secretary of Defense, if we could not get a memo from the Secretary of the Air Force to transfer that material.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - November 13, 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
Dr. GallaudetRear AdmiralFactual AssertionUnder oath
“At the current moment, sir, no, but that is a great point. From 2020 to 2022, there was a UAP task force in the DoD succeeding where Mr. Elizondo worked, led by Jay Stratton, who had the first comprehensive, whole-of-government approach to UAP, which involved pathways to declassification and to increased transparency, as well as assessing the national security risk of UAP. This was a really well-established approach, and we have all advocated that something like it return.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - November 13, 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
David GruschFormer U.S. Space Force OfficerFactual AssertionUnder oath
“You are referring to actual—a public treaty in the U.N. register—it is funny you mentioned that—the agreement on measures to reduce the risk of outbreak of nuclear war signed in 1971. Unclassified treaty publicly available, and if you cite the George Washington University National Security Archives you will find the declassified, in 2013, specific provisions and the specific red line flash message traffic with the specific codes pursuant to Article Three and Article—also situation two, which is in the previously classified NSA archive.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
Michael ShellenbergerEyewitness AccountUnder oath
“Furthermore, these individuals have revealed the name of an active and highly secretive DoD unacknowledged special access program, or USAP. The source of that document told Public, me, that the USAP is a strategic intelligence program that is part of the U.S. military family of longstanding, highly sensitive programs dealing with various aspects of the UAP problem.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - November 13, 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
David GruschFormer U.S. Space Force OfficerAllegationUnder oath
“A complicated question. So, there is, you know, some—I would call it abuse here. So, congressional oversight of conventional Special Access Programs—and I will use Title 10, DoD as an example, right. So, 10 U.S. Code Section 119 discusses congressional oversight of SAPs, discusses the DEP/SecDef's ability to waive congressional reporting. However, the Gang of 8 is at least supposed to be notified if a—you know, a waived or a waive bigoted unacknowledged SAP is created and that is public law.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
Nancy MaceFactual AssertionUnder oath
“this is going to be the original document from the Pentagon about Immaculate Constellation that Michael Shellenberger delivered to Congress today. So, thank you, Mr. Shellenberger, for this information. We are all reading it in real time now, and Mr. Burchett will enter it into the record, but 12 pages about this unacknowledged special access program that your government says does not exist.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - November 13, 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
David GruschFormer U.S. Space Force OfficerAllegationUnder oath
“I became a whistleblower through a PPD–19 urgent concern filing in May 2022 with the intelligence community inspector general following concerning reports from multiple esteemed and credentialed current and former military and intelligence community individuals that the U.S. Government is operating with secrecy above congressional oversight with regards to UAPs.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
Mr. GruschFormer U.S. Space Force OfficerAllegationUnder oath
“Yes. There was some issue with mine. So, you know, PPD–19 process it goes to the intel committees either through PPD–19 or ICD 120. There is not a good way for the intelligence community Inspector General to provide that to other committees, and I asked my information to be sent to the House and Senate Armed Services Committee because there are Title 10 equities at play. But there was no smooth process to do so.”
Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →

Other public statements

1 statementReports, documents, interviews and broadcasts where the speaker was not under oath.