“Are these private companies you are implying, or is this nonhuman intelligence?”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - November 13, 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
Non-Human Intelligence
References to intelligence or entities of non-human origin. Includes testimony about biological remains, communication attempts, and the nature of whoever or whatever is behind the phenomenon.
30 statements shown · 15 peopleUnder oath22 of them
Key claims
The 30 most specific statements on this topic (the list stops at 30)Showing 30 of 30
Under oath
22 statementsSworn testimony comes first.“Yes. Yes, sir.”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - November 13, 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
“When it comes to material that we have, we have no material. We have detected no emanations within the UAP Task Force that is -- that would suggest it is anything nonterrestrial in origin.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“I have experienced advanced UAP firsthand and I am here to voice the concerns of more than 30 commercial aircrew and military veterans who have confided their similar encounters with me.”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
“Yes. The objects that are being seen by commercial pilots are performing maneuvers that are unexplainable due to our current understanding of our technology and our capabilities as a country, and that applies for the military as well.”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
“All right. Mr. Elizondo, you state in your testimony that, quote, ''Advanced technologies not by our government or any other government are monitoring sensitive military installations around the globe,'' end quote. If these technologies are not made by any government, who is making them? Private companies? Or are you implying they are crafted by a nonhuman intelligence?”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - November 13, 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
“Mr. Grusch, in your sworn testimony you state that the U.S. Government has retrieved supposedly extraterrestrial spacecraft and other UAP-related artifacts. You go so far as to state that the U.S. is in possession of, quote, ''nonhuman spacecraft,'' end quote, and that some of these artifacts have circulated with defense contractors.”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
“The American public has a right to learn about technologies of unknown origins, nonhuman intelligence, and unexplainable phenomena. Those are not the words of a UFO Twitter account. That is a direct quote from Majority Leader Chuck Schumer”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
“I also want to note that Mr. Sean Kirkpatrick, Director of the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, the component of the DoD office that investigates UAP data, has testified before the Senate this year that his unit has found no evidence of extraterrestrial activity.”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
“That is something I have not witnessed myself.”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
“NASA has also stated they do not have evidence of extraterrestrial life either and we have heard this, of course, from some of our government agencies.”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
“I wrote a lot about incidents like it, Congressman, but that specific incident involved the USS Omaha, the tour combat ship of the U.S. Navy operating off of Southern California. I do not remember the exact date. It was within the last decade, but what the watch standers on the bridge observed was a UAP. Again, something that was aloft but had no observable exhaust or control surfaces. So, it was something that could not be explained. And then they saw it enter the water from the atmosphere and going through the air/sea interface and so, thus, exhibiting transmedium travel.”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - November 13, 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
“No. No, I have no idea.”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - November 13, 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
“Sure. Indeed, Congressman, and thank you for the question. It is important that we, as a part of this effort, really build out the relationship that we have with others, including NASA, and for the reasons that you just pointed out. So there are elements in our government that are engaged in looking for life in other places, and they have been doing that for decades. They have been searching for extraterrestrial life. There are astrobiologists who have been doing this too. We are a part of that same government. And so our goal is not to potentially cover up something if we were to find something, it is to understand what may be out there, examine what it may mean for us, if there are any, from a defense perspective, any national security implications or ramifications, but then to work with organizations, as appropriate, if it is a weather phenomenology with NOAA, if it is a potential for extraterrestrial life or indication of extraterrestrial life with someone like NASA.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“And so, we must figure out—there is a calculus, capabilities versus intent, in order to identify if something is a national security threat. We have seen some of the capabilities, yet we have no idea on the intent. And so, this is why this discussion is somewhat, I think, problematic from a governmental perspective, because we have no idea.”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - November 13, 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
“Yes, sir, absolutely. They were threatening Navy pilots during the exercise that my people were involved with in 2015, and it is my understanding that they are risking pilot safety, commercial and military, today.”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - November 13, 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
“Yes, and here is why. The technology that we faced was far superior than anything that we had, and you could put that anywhere. If you had one, you captured one, you reverse engineered it, you got it to work, you are talking something that can go into space, go someplace, drop down in a matter of seconds, do whatever it wants, and leave and there is nothing we can do about it. Nothing.”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
“Certainly, there seems to be some indication that they are being provocative, meaning that they are in some cases literally splitting aircraft formations right down the middle. So, that is an air safety issue.”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - November 13, 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
“Are we holding materials, organic or inorganic, that we don't know about? Are we, you know, picking up emanations that are something other than light or infrared that could be deemed to be communications?”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“Nonhuman, and that was the assessment of people with direct knowledge on the program I talked to that are currently still on the program.”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
“I think the same goes with this. We have these things that are being observed over controlled U.S. airspace, and they are not really doing a good job of hiding themselves. They are making it pretty obvious they have the ability to even interfere with our nuclear equities and our nuclear readiness.”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - November 13, 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
“Actually, I have been treated very well and the six people that were involved, myself included, all of them have or will be retiring from the military as 05s, 06s, and all my friends that are very senior, three and four stars, I have talked to them. They believe. They understand there is a problem. But no, I was actually treated really well.”Source: House Oversight UAP Hearing - July 26, 2023 · 26 Jul 2023Read it in context →
Other public statements
8 statementsReports, documents, interviews and broadcasts where the speaker was not under oath.“terrestrial arms race occurring sub-rosa over the past eighty years focused on reverse engineering technologies of unknown origin”Source: The Debrief: Intelligence Officials Say US Has Retrieved Non-Human Craft · 05 Jun 2023Read it in context →
“It is important to underscore that, to date, AARO has discovered no verifiable evidence of extraterrestrial beings, activity, or technology.”Source: Dr. Jon Kosloski Statement for the Record — SASC Nov 2024 · 01 Nov 2024Read it in context →
“Multiple agencies nesting UAP activities in conventional SAP/CAP programs without appropriate reporting to oversight authorities”Source: The Debrief: Intelligence Officials Say US Has Retrieved Non-Human Craft · 05 Jun 2023Read it in context →
“Advanced technologies not made by our Government – or any other government – are monitoring sensitive military installations around the globe.”Source: Written Testimony of Luis Elizondo — Nov 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
“Let me be clear: UAP are real.”Source: Written Testimony of Luis Elizondo — Nov 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →
“The recoveries of partial fragments through and up to intact vehicles have been made for decades through the present day by the government, its allies, and defense contractors.”Source: The Debrief: Intelligence Officials Say US Has Retrieved Non-Human Craft · 05 Jun 2023Read it in context →
“publicly unknown Cold War for recovered and exploited physical material”Source: The Debrief: Intelligence Officials Say US Has Retrieved Non-Human Craft · 05 Jun 2023Read it in context →
“excessive secrecy has led to grave misdeeds against loyal civil servants, military personnel, and the public – all to hide the fact that we are not alone in the cosmos.”Source: Written Testimony of Luis Elizondo — Nov 2024 · 13 Nov 2024Read it in context →