Raja Krishnamoorthi

“And I assume we have never discharged any armaments against a UAP, correct?”

“The first question is -- there have been no collisions between any U.S. assets in one of these UAPs, correct?”

“Last question, have our encounters with UAPs altered the development of our -- either of offensive or defensive capabilities or even our sensor capabilities?”

“So, basically, it sounds like we have a good partnership with FAA. But, apart from FAA, we don't have partnerships with other agencies or other entities that might be tracking so that we could enlarge our dataset to make comparisons.”

“Now how about with regard to UAPs? We have talked about UAPs on training areas. But, obviously, there is some sense or bias. I would think we put sensors in training areas. How about with regard to nontraining areas? Do we track what is in open source and what civilians and others have tracked, and have we found similarities to what they have observed in terms of UAPs in nontraining areas to the ones that are in training areas?”

“Okay. So we can't rule out that some of them may not be physical objects?”

“But the ones where you say most of them represent physical objects, can you say that they are definitely, like with a hundred percent certainty, that they are physical objects?”

“I think one of the biggest questions that I have is we say with a lot of probability, we say that they, quote/unquote, probably do represent physical objects, close quote. When we say "probably," is that because we cannot conclusively say that they are physical objects?”

“Do we have any sensors underwater to detect on submerged UAPs? Anything that is in the ocean or in the seas?”

“How about wreckage? Have we come across any wreckage of any kind of object that has now been examined by you?”