“A number of these UAPs, you said, we can't explain. Again, in the service of sort of reducing speculation and conspiracy theories, "we can't explain" can range from a visual observation that was distant on a foggy night, we don't know what it is, to we have found an organic material that we can't identify. Right? Those are radically different worlds.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
Data Quality
4 statements shown · 3 peopleUnder oath4 of them
Key claims
The 4 most specific statements on this topicShowing 4 of 4
“When you say "we can't explain," everything that you can't explain is in a bucket called data. Is that correct? And that would mean data collected by sensors, visual observations, everything that "we can't explain," quote/unquote, is in the bucket called data.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“Right. A narrative report from the early 2000s, if it just had a little bit of information on it, would be in our database, and it would be unresolved.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“I would add to that it is insufficient data. I mean, that is one of the challenges we have. Insufficient data either on the event itself, the object itself, or insufficient data or plug-in with some other organization or agency that may have had something in that space at that time. So it is a data issue that we are facing in many of these instances, Congressman.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →