“If and when individual UAP incidents are resolved, they likely fall into one of five potential explanatory categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, U.S. Government or U.S. industry developmental programs, foreign adversary systems, or an other bin that allows for a holding bin of difficult cases and for the possibility of surprise and potential scientific discovery”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
Classification
5 statements shown · 2 peopleUnder oath4 of them
Key claims
The 5 most specific statements on this topicShowing 5 of 5
Under oath
4 statementsSworn testimony comes first.“As detailed in the ODNI report, if and when individual UAP incidents are resolved, they likely fall into one of five potential explanatory categories”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“So I think that would be more appropriately addressed in closed session, sir.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“We stand by those initial results”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
Other public statements
1 statementReports, documents, interviews and broadcasts where the speaker was not under oath.AAROOfficial Finding
“KONA BLUE was a Prospective Special Access Program (PSAP) that had been proposed to DHS leadership but was never approved or formally established”Source: AARO: History and Origin of KONA BLUE · 08 Mar 2024Read it in context →