“do you have a clear and repeatable process to check with compartmented programs about whether a UAP sighting is attributable to a U.S. aircraft?”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
U S Platforms
6 statements shown · 2 peopleUnder oath6 of them
Key claims
The 6 most specific statements on this topicShowing 6 of 6
“we have a repeatable process -- I think we have had that process for some time -- to deconflict activities that we may have to ensure that we are not potentially reporting on something that may be a developmental platform or a U.S. operational platform”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“we are very conscious of the potential blue-on-blue issue or U.S. on U.S.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“The UAP Task Force has had a process in place to work with other elements of the Department of Defense and other elements of the government to ensure that there is as simple a way as possible to deconflict those.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“we have established relationships with organizations and entities that are potentially flying or developing platforms for their own interest”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“when we reference that in the report, I should say that we were simply accounting for the fact that there could possibly be one or two data points that had leaked through, but we were quite confident that was not the explanation.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →