“That data is not within the holdings of the UAP Task Force.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
Malmstrom Incident
9 statements shown · 2 peopleUnder oath9 of them
Key claims
The 9 most specific statements on this topicShowing 9 of 9
“All I can speak to is, you know, what is within my cognizance of the UAP Task Force. We have not looked at that incident.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“So you have just seen informal stories, no official assessment that you have done or exists within DOD that you are aware of regarding the Malmstrom incident.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“I have heard stories. I have not seen the official data on that.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“Well, I don't claim to be an authoritative figure, but for what it is worth, I would like you to look into it.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“I am not commenting on the accuracy of this. I am simply asking you whether you are aware of it and whether you have any comment on the accuracy of that report.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“Well, I mean, it is a pretty high-profile incident. I don't claim to be an expert on this, but that is out there in the ether. You are the guys investigating it. I mean, who else is doing it?”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“If for no other reason, you can dismiss it and say this is not worth wasting resources on.”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →
“the same time, a glowing red orb was observed overhead”Source: House Intelligence UAP Hearing - May 17, 2022 · 17 May 2022Read it in context →