<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skittles.com &#8211; A Smart Low Cost Web Strategy &#8211; What&#8217;s Next?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://takemetoyourleader.com/2009/03/03/skittlescom-a-smart-low-cost-web-strategy-whats-next/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://takemetoyourleader.com/2009/03/03/skittlescom-a-smart-low-cost-web-strategy-whats-next/</link>
	<description>"Take Me To Your Leader" focuses on trend watching in consumer behaviors, marketing, technology, and social media, but is often led astray by its eccentric authors and their love of music, traveling, random thoughts, and pirates.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:50:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=491</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Carr</title>
		<link>http://takemetoyourleader.com/2009/03/03/skittlescom-a-smart-low-cost-web-strategy-whats-next/comment-page-1/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>David Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takemetoyourleader.com/?p=903#comment-602</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately the campaign implementation fell down. Skittles was marred by inexcusable usability issues – issues addressed previously in Modernista’s approach – and a blunt legal department imposed age checker that actually turned the experience into that of a site that happened to pull other sites into itself.  But beyond this what actually let it down was the fact that it was actually a great mechanic rather than a conversation. Skittles provoked a lot of conversation but had nothing to say. There was nothing beyond the brand name. There was nothing to channel the crowd’s interest. The content stimulus was weak and so it was filled and abused by people who like to swear in public.

The campaign’s relative merits are still being debated online thus adding to its success in generating more attention than a traditional microsite focused campaign could do on a similar budget. In effect, it made us look, now what?

Despite these failings Skittles can still be seen as an important step forward by a big FMCG brand in its use of interactive marketing. Skittles recognised that there is an internet beyond the “marketing web”, where real people exist outside of brand control. There are platforms being used by real people that are “their territory” and they are far better than any “walled garden” faux-social network that most brands could afford to build. 

It is fragmented campaigns like Skittles that offer an effective and more interesting future for interactive marketing – campaigns that reflect what people are doing in the real world and the digital world. 

Real people’s identities are scattered across services, sites and functions on the internet and digitally enabled devices. As new tools, trends and fads have developed so has the multitude of places where elements of our identity can be accessed. We have become the “fragments shored against [our] ruin”, the comments we have made, the transactions we have completed and the user accounts we have collected or even forgotten that we had. As UnHub, a consumer service inspired by the Skittles campaign which will let you create your own personal Skittles-type experience, puts it: You are Everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately the campaign implementation fell down. Skittles was marred by inexcusable usability issues – issues addressed previously in Modernista’s approach – and a blunt legal department imposed age checker that actually turned the experience into that of a site that happened to pull other sites into itself.  But beyond this what actually let it down was the fact that it was actually a great mechanic rather than a conversation. Skittles provoked a lot of conversation but had nothing to say. There was nothing beyond the brand name. There was nothing to channel the crowd’s interest. The content stimulus was weak and so it was filled and abused by people who like to swear in public.</p>
<p>The campaign’s relative merits are still being debated online thus adding to its success in generating more attention than a traditional microsite focused campaign could do on a similar budget. In effect, it made us look, now what?</p>
<p>Despite these failings Skittles can still be seen as an important step forward by a big FMCG brand in its use of interactive marketing. Skittles recognised that there is an internet beyond the “marketing web”, where real people exist outside of brand control. There are platforms being used by real people that are “their territory” and they are far better than any “walled garden” faux-social network that most brands could afford to build. </p>
<p>It is fragmented campaigns like Skittles that offer an effective and more interesting future for interactive marketing – campaigns that reflect what people are doing in the real world and the digital world. </p>
<p>Real people’s identities are scattered across services, sites and functions on the internet and digitally enabled devices. As new tools, trends and fads have developed so has the multitude of places where elements of our identity can be accessed. We have become the “fragments shored against [our] ruin”, the comments we have made, the transactions we have completed and the user accounts we have collected or even forgotten that we had. As UnHub, a consumer service inspired by the Skittles campaign which will let you create your own personal Skittles-type experience, puts it: You are Everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Gutting</title>
		<link>http://takemetoyourleader.com/2009/03/03/skittlescom-a-smart-low-cost-web-strategy-whats-next/comment-page-1/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Gutting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takemetoyourleader.com/?p=903#comment-576</guid>
		<description>You know, you&#039;ve got some good points and I think I&#039;d be too
narrow-minded to ignore them. I really want to be excited about this,
and I think that maybe I can be. I&#039;m a skittles fan and have been
since I was...8? When Modernista released their site, it was
like--whoa, cool. For a bunch of dudes who did slick TV spots for gas
guzzlers, it was a shock, and a pleasant one at that. This skittles
stuff felt a bit forced--or at least the Twitter portion did. I
understand Twitter, but I doubt I&#039;ll tweat. It&#039;d just be &quot;Brad&#039;s going
to go play soccer&quot; or &quot;Brad looked dumb at rugby practice&quot; or &quot;Brad is
watching the UFC with rednecks.&quot; Which, granted, could be amusing in
its own right. But I&#039;m really interested in the possibility of Twitter
being a super-charged version of Wiki Answers. More on that later
though.

Advertising or &quot;branding&quot; can be a tough thing to justify to your
average C-level guy. So, one of the ways I explain it is, having a
good brand requires you to do less busy work. You spend less time and
money trying to convince a person to buy whatever it is you&#039;re
selling. What most execs don&#039;t see is just how damn hard it is to get
to that point. They see the evangelism of companies with tremendous
brand equity and forget about the discipline required to achieve the
same things. And these days, the path isn&#039;t clear at all. You can&#039;t
follow a formula or stick to a routine. You&#039;re hosed if you do that.

By virtue of the fact that skittles is DOING this, and
being that mobile and that nimble? Goes a long way for them. My personal reaction isn&#039;t that important here. I loved what you said about how skittles knows they can&#039;t control their brand--this hits at something else I wonder about constantly: ownership and how it&#039;s increasingly difficult to own things. Whenever I see someone tightening their grip on some &quot;precious&quot; commodity, I&#039;m like, &quot;dude, let it go. You&#039;re wearing yourself out on something you can&#039;t possibly hold onto.&quot; Reversing course on that line of thinking will require a lot of effort, but it&#039;s necessary.

Bottom line is...we&#039;re lucky to be working in such a fascinating, challenging time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, you&#8217;ve got some good points and I think I&#8217;d be too<br />
narrow-minded to ignore them. I really want to be excited about this,<br />
and I think that maybe I can be. I&#8217;m a skittles fan and have been<br />
since I was&#8230;8? When Modernista released their site, it was<br />
like&#8211;whoa, cool. For a bunch of dudes who did slick TV spots for gas<br />
guzzlers, it was a shock, and a pleasant one at that. This skittles<br />
stuff felt a bit forced&#8211;or at least the Twitter portion did. I<br />
understand Twitter, but I doubt I&#8217;ll tweat. It&#8217;d just be &#8220;Brad&#8217;s going<br />
to go play soccer&#8221; or &#8220;Brad looked dumb at rugby practice&#8221; or &#8220;Brad is<br />
watching the UFC with rednecks.&#8221; Which, granted, could be amusing in<br />
its own right. But I&#8217;m really interested in the possibility of Twitter<br />
being a super-charged version of Wiki Answers. More on that later<br />
though.</p>
<p>Advertising or &#8220;branding&#8221; can be a tough thing to justify to your<br />
average C-level guy. So, one of the ways I explain it is, having a<br />
good brand requires you to do less busy work. You spend less time and<br />
money trying to convince a person to buy whatever it is you&#8217;re<br />
selling. What most execs don&#8217;t see is just how damn hard it is to get<br />
to that point. They see the evangelism of companies with tremendous<br />
brand equity and forget about the discipline required to achieve the<br />
same things. And these days, the path isn&#8217;t clear at all. You can&#8217;t<br />
follow a formula or stick to a routine. You&#8217;re hosed if you do that.</p>
<p>By virtue of the fact that skittles is DOING this, and<br />
being that mobile and that nimble? Goes a long way for them. My personal reaction isn&#8217;t that important here. I loved what you said about how skittles knows they can&#8217;t control their brand&#8211;this hits at something else I wonder about constantly: ownership and how it&#8217;s increasingly difficult to own things. Whenever I see someone tightening their grip on some &#8220;precious&#8221; commodity, I&#8217;m like, &#8220;dude, let it go. You&#8217;re wearing yourself out on something you can&#8217;t possibly hold onto.&#8221; Reversing course on that line of thinking will require a lot of effort, but it&#8217;s necessary.</p>
<p>Bottom line is&#8230;we&#8217;re lucky to be working in such a fascinating, challenging time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freddie Laker</title>
		<link>http://takemetoyourleader.com/2009/03/03/skittlescom-a-smart-low-cost-web-strategy-whats-next/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddie Laker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takemetoyourleader.com/?p=903#comment-563</guid>
		<description>Hi Brad,

I&#039;ve spent the good portion of my recent career working on brands like Guinness, Coca-Cola, vitaminwater, Slim Jim, Burn, Fanta, PowerAde, Mentos, Wrigley, etc...

Seemingly all things you&#039;d never imagine people talking about, but amazingly they are. They&#039;re mentioning it in passing and sometimes as the focus of conversations in all kinds of places across the web. You&#039;d be truly suprised.

The Skittles.com site isn&#039;t a campaign for me. It&#039;s not about getting people talking. (Although it has in our marketing community without a doubt.) Skittles.com is a brand site. The campaigns that skittles.com does through out the year should be what generate buzz and when they do create buzz that buzz will be captured and shared at the main brand site.

Check out their fan site on Facebook. They didn&#039;t get over half a million fans after this site was created. They existed long before (which probably caused their enthusiasm in this idea). 

I don&#039;t think anyone is expecting skittles magazine to come out anytime soon dedicated to fanaticism about the product, but the reality is skittles amuse people enough everyday to cause them to talk about it even what might be viewed as inane ways. Trust me, I&#039;ve seen it about far more meaningless and less inspiring products.

This site, used properly, in conjunction with great campaign work will be a big hit for them. 

Feel free to email me or call me anytime. I&#039;m happy to talk about it at length.

Thanks for having a strong opinion - I can never fault you for that!

-Freddie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brad,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spent the good portion of my recent career working on brands like Guinness, Coca-Cola, vitaminwater, Slim Jim, Burn, Fanta, PowerAde, Mentos, Wrigley, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Seemingly all things you&#8217;d never imagine people talking about, but amazingly they are. They&#8217;re mentioning it in passing and sometimes as the focus of conversations in all kinds of places across the web. You&#8217;d be truly suprised.</p>
<p>The Skittles.com site isn&#8217;t a campaign for me. It&#8217;s not about getting people talking. (Although it has in our marketing community without a doubt.) Skittles.com is a brand site. The campaigns that skittles.com does through out the year should be what generate buzz and when they do create buzz that buzz will be captured and shared at the main brand site.</p>
<p>Check out their fan site on Facebook. They didn&#8217;t get over half a million fans after this site was created. They existed long before (which probably caused their enthusiasm in this idea). </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone is expecting skittles magazine to come out anytime soon dedicated to fanaticism about the product, but the reality is skittles amuse people enough everyday to cause them to talk about it even what might be viewed as inane ways. Trust me, I&#8217;ve seen it about far more meaningless and less inspiring products.</p>
<p>This site, used properly, in conjunction with great campaign work will be a big hit for them. </p>
<p>Feel free to email me or call me anytime. I&#8217;m happy to talk about it at length.</p>
<p>Thanks for having a strong opinion &#8211; I can never fault you for that!</p>
<p>-Freddie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Gutting</title>
		<link>http://takemetoyourleader.com/2009/03/03/skittlescom-a-smart-low-cost-web-strategy-whats-next/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Gutting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takemetoyourleader.com/?p=903#comment-562</guid>
		<description>Sure, ad people and marketing people are talking about it, but is anyone else? Does it matter? Most of the Tweats are &quot;what this means for marketing.&quot; And what about the myriad bogus postings on the facebook site talking about what a &quot;brilliant&quot; marketing campaign this was? That just reeks. This isn&#039;t a solution: it&#039;s just an attempt to co-opt every web-based tool-du-jour and it feels very &quot;me-too!&quot; And let&#039;s be real: skittles aren&#039;t a product you dream of, plan to buy (generally), or research. It&#039;s candy. You don&#039;t have conversations about skittles, you don&#039;t have meaningful experiences with skittles, you have quick fixes with them and maybe contemplate different ways to eat them or combine them. And then the bag is empty and the experience over. This just looks like MBAs run amok.
 
Just because you CAN do something doesn&#039;t mean that you should. Good things happen organically...and this feels utterly contrived.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, ad people and marketing people are talking about it, but is anyone else? Does it matter? Most of the Tweats are &#8220;what this means for marketing.&#8221; And what about the myriad bogus postings on the facebook site talking about what a &#8220;brilliant&#8221; marketing campaign this was? That just reeks. This isn&#8217;t a solution: it&#8217;s just an attempt to co-opt every web-based tool-du-jour and it feels very &#8220;me-too!&#8221; And let&#8217;s be real: skittles aren&#8217;t a product you dream of, plan to buy (generally), or research. It&#8217;s candy. You don&#8217;t have conversations about skittles, you don&#8217;t have meaningful experiences with skittles, you have quick fixes with them and maybe contemplate different ways to eat them or combine them. And then the bag is empty and the experience over. This just looks like MBAs run amok.</p>
<p>Just because you CAN do something doesn&#8217;t mean that you should. Good things happen organically&#8230;and this feels utterly contrived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
